Conference 2003

Conferences: 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999

Conference 2006
Plants as infrastructure

Main Conference Page | Programme |
Registration form | Venue | Accommodation

Abstract:

Plants are the Infrastructure to Ecological and Cultural Integrity

COLIN MEURK

The often bitter debate over the types and nature of plants in our cultural landscapes demonstrates how seriously society regards these green backdrops to our lives. Clearly there is greater meaning attached to the form, layout and origins of the trees, shrubs, herbaceous plants, grasses and weeds in our cities and countrysides than most people care to admit. Large council budgets are devoted to managing public parks and gardens and biosecurity in our towns, and nation-wide there is enormous input of resources into managing private lawns and other decorative or symbolic plant associations that adorn our urban gardens. We acknowledge that plants proscribe significant biodiversity, aesthetic, amenity, historic and cultural value. Change is inevitable and is increasingly (self-consciously) directed by some sectors of society rather than occurring spontaneously. Therefore rational and inclusive design and management steps need to be taken to accommodate the values that different sectoral groups ascribe to plants. Without this there will be an incoherent, even divisive and arrested culture and a perpetuation of decisions made by colonists over a century ago. The losers will be endemic wildlife (ecological integrity), the global community who wish to experience an authentic New Zealand, and ultimately New Zealand citizens who seek a mature, unique and diverse identity as symbolised in landscape design and who recognise the important role that plants have in knitting the infrastructure together.

We explore a sequence of logical steps that might inform a consultative process and subsequent decision-making about plant structural and functional roles. We believe that existing models of consultation do not address the divisions of opinion, nor ecological bottom lines and merely reinforce existing power elites and winner-take all decisions especially in key visible locations. The steps and criteria for determining plant priorities should include: 'pose no biosecurity risk', sustainability, valuable/essential to wildlife, provide amenity value; then establish appropriate site designs that relate to scale of site and other socially-desired roles, and establish landscape designs that provide for spatial connectivity. We finally present examplars of indigenous and equivalent exotic structural species for different garden types and elements.

Colin D Meurk
Landcare Research, PO Box 69, Lincoln 8152
Email: meurkc@landcareresearch.co.nz

Simon Swaffield
Lincoln University, Lincoln 8152
Email: swaffies@lincoln.ac.nz.

 

 


Home | Journal | Newsletter | Conferences
Awards | Join RNZIH | RNZIH Directory | Links

© 2000–2024 Royal New Zealand Institute of Horticulture


Last updated: August 8, 2010