| 
   Conference 
              2006Plants as infrastructure

 Abstract:Plants 
              are the Infrastructure to Ecological and Cultural IntegrityCOLIN 
              MEURKThe often bitter debate 
              over the types and nature of plants in our cultural landscapes demonstrates 
              how seriously society regards these green backdrops to our lives. 
              Clearly there is greater meaning attached to the form, layout and 
              origins of the trees, shrubs, herbaceous plants, grasses and weeds 
              in our cities and countrysides than most people care to admit. Large 
              council budgets are devoted to managing public parks and gardens 
              and biosecurity in our towns, and nation-wide there is enormous 
              input of resources into managing private lawns and other decorative 
              or symbolic plant associations that adorn our urban gardens. We 
              acknowledge that plants proscribe significant biodiversity, aesthetic, 
              amenity, historic and cultural value. Change is inevitable and is 
              increasingly (self-consciously) directed by some sectors of society 
              rather than occurring spontaneously. Therefore rational and inclusive 
              design and management steps need to be taken to accommodate the 
              values that different sectoral groups ascribe to plants. Without 
              this there will be an incoherent, even divisive and arrested culture 
              and a perpetuation of decisions made by colonists over a century 
              ago. The losers will be endemic wildlife (ecological integrity), 
              the global community who wish to experience an authentic New Zealand, 
              and ultimately New Zealand citizens who seek a mature, unique and 
              diverse identity as symbolised in landscape design and who recognise 
              the important role that plants have in knitting the infrastructure 
              together. We explore a sequence 
              of logical steps that might inform a consultative process and subsequent 
              decision-making about plant structural and functional roles. We 
              believe that existing models of consultation do not address the 
              divisions of opinion, nor ecological bottom lines and merely reinforce 
              existing power elites and winner-take all decisions especially in 
              key visible locations. The steps and criteria for determining plant 
              priorities should include: 'pose no biosecurity risk', sustainability, 
              valuable/essential to wildlife, provide amenity value; then establish 
              appropriate site designs that relate to scale of site and other 
              socially-desired roles, and establish landscape designs that provide 
              for spatial connectivity. We finally present examplars of indigenous 
              and equivalent exotic structural species for different garden types 
              and elements. Colin D Meurk 
              Landcare Research, PO Box 69, Lincoln 8152
 Email: meurkc@landcareresearch.co.nz
 Simon Swaffield Lincoln University, Lincoln 8152
 Email: swaffies@lincoln.ac.nz.
     |