Conference
1999
New Zealand Plants and their Story
The
Role of Native Plant Collections A Blue Print for the Future(1)
Michael
R. Oates
Curator Manager
The Botanic Gardens of Wellington,
Wellington City Council, Box 2199, Wellington, New Zealand
Historical background
It was soon after Cook's
first voyage with Banks and Solander in 1769 that the first New
Zealand plants found their way back to Europe and into botanical
collections at Kew Gardens. Phormium tenax and Clianthus
puniceus found their way into collections and were two of the
first plants illustrated in Curtis' Botanical magazine.
In New Zealand the first
major native plant collection was established in the Christchurch
Botanic Gardens. In 1867, soon after the gardens were established,
John Armstrong was appointed as the second Government Gardener and
during his 22-year tenure was assisted by his son Joseph (Christchurch
BG management plan). By 1875 they had established a native section
of the Garden. According to Leonard Cockayne (Cockayne 1911), the
Armstrong's recognised the value of the plants for horticultural
purposes, and used their collection as a living museum of plant
material which students could consult. It is interesting to speculate
what influence this collection would have on Cockayne when he proposed
the development of a national collection of native plants at Otari
10 years later. Armstrong published many scientific papers based
on his work with the collection. The collection grew to 500 species
including the largest collection of New Zealand Veronica species.
At the same time, native
plant collections were being developed in other New Zealand botanic
gardens. In Dunedin, the Gardener Alexander Begg reported in 1865
that "I have now distributed upwards of thirty collections of
native seeds, each containing upwards of seventy different varieties,
to nearly all parts of the world, for which I am now receiving ample
returns"
In the Wellington Botanic
Garden there was also much interest in establishing collections
of New Zealand plants. The Botanic Garden Board supported collectors
such as Henry Travers, John Buchanan and Thomas Kirk in their plant
collecting trips and by 1877, there were 63 introduced native species.
The Garden like others in New Zealand also sent native plants overseas
and in 1882-3 collections of plants and seeds were sent to Botanic
Gardens at Kew, Jamaica, Hobart, Washington, and Melbourne.
Private collectors were
also establishing plant collections including William Alexander
Thomson of Halfway Bush, Dunedin. Over a period of 40 years in the
early 20th century he established a major plant collection
at FernTree House containing over 1200 species, most collected by
himself.
Native plant material
was sent overseas in large quantities during the nineteenth century.
Charles Nelson (1989) described the major role New Zealand plants
have played in the horticultural development of English and Irish
gardens. Few New Zealand species were introduced into European gardens
before 1840. In 1839, 77 lots of New Zealand seed were given to
Kew and other lots with 90 and 56 species came in 1841. The Irish
Nursery of Rodger, McLelland and Co offered seventeen New Zealand
species and cultivars for sale in 1879. Many commercially available
cultivars at this time had French names suggesting they were raised
there.
In the United States,
too the flow of plants was two way. During the nineteenth century
many America species were imported into New Zealand for economic
purposes. Importation of New Zealand plants into North America began
in 1860 with pohutukawa, now one of San Francisco's most popular
street trees. In 1915 the Panama Pacific International Exposition
took place in San Francisco. New Zealand mounted a major display
as part of this, which included a large selection of New Zealand
native plants. Following the Exhibition, the New Zealand Government
gifted 150 plants to Golden Gate Park. These became the basis for
a New Zealand collection in the Strybing Arboretum, one of the most
important offshore New Zealand plant collections. In 1936 the Strybing
inventory listed 289 New Zealand woody taxa in 89 genera.
An historical summary would
not be complete without some mention of Dr Leonard Cockayne. Dr Cockayne
recognised the importance of plant collections as a resource for researchers
in systematic botany as well as their role in encouraging the use
of native plants in horticulture. He established his own experimental
garden at his house in Sumner, Christchurch. Later, after his move
to Wellington it was Cockayne, along with J. G. McKenzie, Director
of Parks and Reserves who established a major national resource at
Otari in 1926.
Otari Open Air Native
Plant Museum:
Otari was a
large reserve partly covered in native forest in the Wellington
suburb of Wilton. Cockayne saw its potential as a national botanic
garden. Along with J. G. McKenzie, Director of Parks for Wellington
he commenced development in 1926. Cockayne's vision for Otari was
published in 1932 (Cockayne1932). Cockayne directed the philosophy
and development of Otari and laid down four major objective for
the reserve:
- The flora.
A collection shall be made of all the New Zealand species possible
to cultivate in the Museum. The species will be arranged as far
as possible according to their families.
- The Vegetation.
Examples shall be artificially produced of various types of the
primitive vegetation of New Zealand, for instance kauri forest,
southern beech forest.
- Restoration
of the forest. The forest of them Museum shall be brought
back as far as possible to its original form...
- Horticulture.
The use of indigenous plants for horticultural purposes shall
be illustrated in various ways.
Otari became New Zealand's
foremost plant collection and the only botanic garden devoted exclusively
to native plants. Over the past 70 years of development, Otari has
developed a world-class reputation and built up a major collection
of native plants. Today it contains about 1200 species and cultivars,
represented by about 4000 accessions. Major influences on the development
of Otari and its plant collections include Walter Brockie who came
from the Christchurch Botanic Garden in 1948. He established the
rock garden and travelled throughout New Zealand and its off shore
islands in the 1950's collecting plants. Raymond Mole became Curator
in 1963, and he developed the horticultural role of Otari and selected
many plants with horticultural potential. During his time the Wahine
storm opened up areas of forest which he developed into the present
day Fernery, Wild Garden and Dracophyllum Garden.
More recently a major
redevelopment of Otari and it collections fronting Wilton Road has
seen the establishment of a major alpine garden planted in ecological
associations complete with mountain tarn and boglands. This development,
developed under the guidance of assistant curator Anita Benbrook
reflects the modern day focus of botanic gardens on natural habitats
and associations of plants.
Survey of Native Plant
Collections
In 1999, the author undertook
a survey of New Zealand plants being grown in major public and private
gardens, both in New Zealand and overseas. This first survey was
based on the authors' personal knowledge of native plant collections,
and historical records showing which overseas gardens had received
major shipments of plants and/or seed in the past. Sixteen New Zealand
and thirteen overseas collections were sent survey forms. Those
gardens written to are detailed in appendix 1. The questions were:
A Survey of New Zealand
Native Plant Collections
- Please list your
major collections of New Zealand plants and give the following
details:
i) Size and
composition of each collection. For instance: Hebe collection
comprising 45 species and 92 cultivars.
ii) Objectives
of the collection. Is it for educational, conservation, and/or
research purposes? Please describe in detail.
iii) Does each
collection have a formal policy? If so could you please include
a copy here?
iv) How do
you collect plant material for the collection?
v) Do you keep
records of the collection? Are these kept manually or electronically?
- How long have
you been collecting New Zealand plants? Do you see this collection
as increasing in size and importance in the future?
- Are your New
Zealand collections under any type of threat?, for instance lack
of funding, lack of skills to look after them , property being
sold and so on.
- Please provide
any other information about your collections that may be of interest.
Survey forms were returned
to the author by 31st July 1999. Only one garden did
not reply to the survey. In addition, another 9 collection were
identified by recipients of the survey. These are listed in table
2 but have not yet been contacted for information at the time of
writing this paper.
Main results of the
survey
There are a wide range
of native plants in cultivation
Whilst an assessment
was not carried out of the total number of New Zealand species in
cultivation a wide range of plant material is being grown including
many uncommon and threatened species. Many collections have multiple
accessions of some species, increasing the value of these collections
for research and/or conservation purposes.
Collections within New
Zealand understandably had the most comprehensive collections of
naturally occurring taxa. Conversely many overseas collections had
very comprehensive collections of cultivars. This perhaps reflects
the major focus in the UK in particular, on cultivated plants and
the development of garden forms. It also reflects the increased
awareness of the need to conserve historic cultivars. Several of
the UK collections were national collections managed under the auspices
of the National Council for the Conservation of Plants and Gardens
(NCCPG). It is of concern in New Zealand that no collections surveyed
mentioned they were specifically collecting and/or conserving cultivars.
Important collections
in private hands
This survey reinforced
the pattern in other surveys both here and overseas: many major
collections are in private hands. These are developed over many
years by enthusiasts who build up a detailed knowledge of the plants
they grow. However, the collections are vulnerable to loss or dispersement
once the person passes away. The case of Tony Druce's collection
that is now held by Percy's Reserve in Lower Hutt is a welcome exception
to the rule with all of the collection remaining intact and professionally
managed.
Integrity and objectives
of collections
The vast majority of
collections had comprehensive records and many were recorded on
electronic database. Five of those surveyed submitted a listing
of all extant taxa in their collections. Most also grew plants from
wild sourced material.
Few gardens had specific
and clear objectives for their collections and mentioned general
educational and conservation goals without really defining what
they meant or how they were going to be achieved. Some, however,
like Christchurch Botanic Gardens had very clear, specific objectives.
For instance the objective of the Rock Garden collection is to:
"Grow a wide range
of New Zealand alpine, subalpine and montane plants, including those
that are rare and endangered, with an emphasis on plants of the
Canterbury Region"
Few described in detail
how their collections contributed to conservation or research programmes.
Edinburgh Botanic Garden was the only one that identified their
collection of New Zealand Apiaceae were part of research programme
on the taxonomy of this family.
Few collections mentioned
they had an ethnobotanical or economic focus and only Pukeiti mentioned
they were working with local iwi. There would seem to be some major
opportunities here that are not being exploited.
Co-ordination between
collections
Collections in the UK
are co-ordinated through the NCCPG collection scheme, which sets
minimum standards for collections. In New Zealand there was no obvious
co-ordination between collectors although many did mention they
worked with each other and donated plants and seed to other gardens.
Some gardens, such as Christchurch were focussing on regional collections,
whilst several Wellington collections participated in a regional
plant conservation network in association with the Department of
Conservation. A similar scheme operated in Auckland.
A future role for plant
collections: an integrated network
There are advantages
in developing greater integration and co-operation between the major
native plant collections both here and overseas. This would enable
us to broaden the genetic diversity of our plant collections and
share responsibility for conservation amongst gardens. It would
also enable greater clarity regarding the continued export of plant
material at the time of the Convention on Biological Diversity.
Benefits
- Conserve as wide a
range as possible of our native germplasm amongst gardens and
avoid overlaps. In particular heirloom collections of cultivars
that are becoming lost to cultivation
- Provide official collections
for use in selection, breeding, evaluation and introduction and
taxonomic study. This will, in some cases take pressure off wild
populations with the increase in unauthorised collecting.
- Give gardens a much
more focussed approach to developing their collections and the
ability to concentrate on collecting specific genera and or species
- These collections
will serve as reference centres for plant identification, cultivar
registration, nomenclature and plant exploration.
How do we do it?
So where do we start
and how do we carry out the work needed to make such a system work?
Such collection schemes have been tried before and failed. The key
is:
- To keep such networks
simple and have them regionally based at first provided.
- Develop national standards
and policies. Such policies should be based on those currently
operative in many botanic gardens and international conventions
such as the Convention on Biological Diversity.
- Develop national collections
for specific species and cultivars, particularly those that are
not currently represented in collections. This will involve a
further survey to identify the gaps.
- Work with iwi to identify
issues and possible collections focussing on ethnobotanical/cultural/economic
themes.
Such an initiative is
compatible with current initiatives such as the Gardens Association
and regional plant conservation networks. The RNZIH is an ideal
organisation to pick up and run with such an initiative. The time
is right.
Table 1: New Zealand
Collections
Collection |
Established |
Objectives |
Major
plant groups |
Total
number of taxa/accessions |
Records |
Collection
policy |
Threats |
Landcare Research, Lincoln, Canterbury |
1954 |
Research, large
cultivar collection. Material changes from time to time depending
on research being carried out. |
Coprosma (54 cvs.), Corokia (14
cvs.), Pittosporum (46 cvs.), Hebe (119 cvs.), Phormium (61
cvs.) |
Over 650 species |
Yes, electronic |
No written policy |
Once research projects finished
some plants are surplus to requirements. These are usually offered
to other botanical institutions such as Christchurch Botanic
Gardens. |
Grounds Department,
Victoria University of Wellington |
1988 |
Landscape
values, education primarily for students
studying courses in biological sciences |
Phormium (36 cvs.
from Rene Orchiston collection), divaricates (25 spp.), Chatham
Islands (12 spp.), Cordyline (4 spp., 9 selections). |
|
Yes, electronic |
No. NZ planting policy
applies on campus
|
· University
expansion taking grounds for new buildings.
· Future
focus and priorities for University
|
Auckland Regional
Botanic Gardens |
1975 |
· Conservation,
particularly in threatened species recovery programme
· Education
· Amenity |
Phormium, Leptospermum,
Metroideros, Lepidium, Hebe. |
about 1200 accessions |
Yes, electronic.
Full species list provided |
General collection
policy. Plant Conservation Policy for ARBG. |
None |
Fernglen Native Plant Gardens,
North Shore City |
1950's |
Education and
conservation |
Ferns and sub alpines. Outlying
islands. |
about 300 species |
Yes |
Management Plan. This has some
broad policy statements |
North Shore City have taken over
the garden and ensured its survival and future development.
Formerly the private home and collection of Muriel and William
Fisher. |
Massey University
Grounds |
|
· Education
· Research
· Amenity |
Wide range of plants
suited to the conditions. Large forest remnant. |
Over 400 species
and cvs. |
Yes |
No formal policy |
|
Pukekura Park, New Plymouth |
|
Education, Amenity |
Ferns (110 spp.), Phormium (Orchiston)
|
Not given |
Yes |
Formal policy being developed |
Lack of skills |
Otari - Wilton's
Bush, Wellington |
1926 |
· Education
· Conservation
- species recovery programme with DOC. Wellington Plant Collections
network.
·
amenity |
Taxonomic collections,
geographic collections, alpine and rock garden plants, threatened
species, |
Over 3000 accessions |
Yes, electronic.
Full accessions list supplied |
General collection
policy. Individual policy for each collection. |
Pressure on funds
through annual plan funding. |
Christchurch Botanic Gardens,
Christchurch |
1875 |
· Education
· Conservation
· Amenity |
Cockayne Memorial Garden, Hebe
(86 spp., 65 cvs.), Phormium (29 cvs.), Pittosporum (14 spp.,
22 cvs.), Sophora (5 spp., 3 cvs.), Leptospermum (2 spp., 10
cvs.), Lophomyrtus (2 spp., 10 cvs.), Olearia (24 spp., 5 cvs.).
Ferns (50 spp.). Theme areas include NZ Lake, NZ Bush, River
margin and Dryland, rock Garden, alpine plants. |
<650 spp. & <250 cvs. |
Yes |
Yes. Specific policies for each
theme area. |
|
Dunedin Botanic Garden, Dunedin |
1865 |
Education and conservation |
Alpine plants, Asteraceae, Hebe
(95 spp.), Coprosma (37 spp.), Brachyglottis (23 spp.). |
3430 accessions. 967 spp. and
256 cvs. |
Yes, electronic. Full species
list provided. |
Outlined in 1993 Management Plan.
|
Disease in some collections such
as Olearia. |
Oratia Native Plant Nursery,
West Auckland |
1975 |
Plant production, Conservation |
Range varies depending on availability
of material. |
Over 650 spp. and cvs. |
Yes |
No |
|
Pukeiti Rhododendron Trust, Taranaki |
1951 |
Amenity value (back drop to rhododendron
collection). Conservation |
Threatened species,
Sub Antarctic |
Not known at this stage |
Yes |
No |
Lack of funding |
Timaru Botanic Gardens, Timaru |
1981 |
Educational, conservation |
Association beds, Flax bed, grasses,
South Canterbury collection, Fernery, endangered species. |
About 650 accessions. 84 threatened
species |
Yes, electronic. Full species
list provided. |
|
|
Percy's Reserve,
Lower Hutt |
1988 |
· Conservation
- DOC Recovery programmes
· Research
- Material supplied to researchers
· Education
- Polytechnic course based here. |
Accessions include
Hebes (251), Coprosma (63), Olearia (71), Celmisia (103), Carex
(111), Brachyglottis (50). Includes Tony Druce plant collection.
Contains no cultivars. |
2300 accessions |
Yes, electronic |
No. Performance
criteria in Contract with the Hutt City Council. |
New road alignment
may reduce reserve area. |
Arnold Dench, Newlands, Wellington |
1966 |
Conservation and threatened species.
Growing a wide variety of natives in a small section. |
Lianes and trailing plants. Ferns,
orchids, grasses, rushes, Hebes (80 spp. 80 cvs.). Celmisia
(20 spp.), Myosotis (20 spp. 6 hybrids), Carex(36 spp.), Uncinia
(15 spp.), Leptinella (19 spp.). |
|
Yes |
No |
Private collection in small suburban
garden |
Grant Bawden, Christchurch |
1989 |
Show the range of alpine plants
suitable for show purposes, both species and hybrids. |
Aciphylla (12 spp.), Raoulia
(19 spp.), intergeneric hybrids. |
<150 accessions |
Yes. Full species list provided.
|
No |
|
Peter Nicol and Evan Hooper,
Wairarapa |
1988 |
Plant production and conservation |
|
500-600 spp. |
|
|
|
Joanne Orwin, Christchurch |
1970 |
Alpine plants |
|
100+ spp. |
|
|
|
Graeme McArthur, Lothlorien Nursery,
Canterbury |
|
Greater use of natives especially
those not well known. Threatened species. |
|
250 spp. 70 forms and cvs. |
|
No. Plants will be passed to
another charitable trust |
|
Talisman Nurseries
Otaki |
1973 |
Educational and
conservation
|
Hebes 75 spp.
Subalpines 150 spp. Inc
grasses, composites, herbs, low cushion shrubs |
>1200 spp. And cvs. |
Yes |
No |
|
Table 2: Overseas New
Zealand Plant Collections
Collection |
Established |
Objectives |
Major
plant groups |
accessions |
records |
collection
policy |
Threats |
Royal Botanic Gardens Kew, England |
1800 |
Research, horticultural display.
|
Hebe |
292 accessions representing 146
taxa |
Yes |
No |
|
Edinburgh Botanic Garden, Scotland |
100 + yrs |
Research (Apiaiceae), Education |
Celmisia (30 spp.), Aciphylla
(15 spp.), Raoulia (9 spp. & hybrids) |
391 spp. |
Yes |
Yes |
|
University of Bristol BG, England |
1980 |
Landscape values, education,
research |
Rock garden plants. Hebe (58
spp. 81 cvs.), Cordyline (5 spp.). |
About 200 spp. and cvs. |
Yes. Full species list provided.
|
|
|
Strybing Arboretum, San Franscisco,
USA |
1915 |
Education focusing on ethnobotany
Plants in Californian Horticulture.
|
|
About 200 spp. and cvs. |
Yes. Full species list provided.
|
No |
Major new developments following
devastating hurricane several years ago. |
Royal Botanic Gardens, Sydney,
Australia |
|
Education, Research and Recreation |
Range of plantings at the main
Garden in Sydney, with more thematic plantings at Mount Tomah.
Future plans for a Gondwana type collection at Mt Tomah. |
925 accessions representing 454
taxa. |
Yes, electronic. Full species
list provided. |
Being reviewed. |
|
Inverewe Gardens, Scotland |
|
NCCPG National Collection of
Olearia |
Olearia 46 spp
& cvs. (Aust as well) |
|
|
|
|
Mount Stewart Gardens, Northern
Ireland |
|
NCCPG National Collection of
Phormium |
Phormium (40 cvs.) |
|
|
|
|
Ventnor Botanic Garden, Isle
of Wight, England |
|
NCCPG National Collection of
Pseudopanax |
Pseudopanax 15 spp. & 9 cvs. |
|
|
|
Many plants in the collection
stolen several years ago. Collection being re established following
donation of seed from New Zealand. |
Fingal County Council, Dublin,
Southern Ireland |
|
NCCPG National Collection of
Olearia |
Olearia 39 spp. & 9 cvs. |
|
|
|
|
Bicton College of Agriculture,
Devon, England |
|
NCCPG National Collection of
Pittosporum |
Pittosporum 70 spp. & cvs. |
|
|
|
|
G Hutchins, County Park Nursery,
Essex, England |
|
NCCPG National Collections of
Parahebe and Coprosma |
Parahebe 11 spp. & 17 cvs.
Coprosma 26spp. & 50 cvs.
|
|
|
|
|
M Searle, Guernsey |
|
NCCPG National Collection of
Hebe |
Hebe 130 cvs. |
|
|
|
|
Siskin Plants, East Anglia, England |
|
NCCPG National Collection of
Hebe |
Hebe 32 spp. & 53 cvs. |
|
|
|
|
N Hutchinson, Yorkshire, England |
|
NCCPG National Collection of
Hebe |
Hebe 200 spp. & cvs. |
|
|
|
|
Table 3: Further Collections
Not yet Assessed
Chelsea Physic
Garden, London, England
|
The National
Botanic Gardens of Arts, Culture and the Gaelacht, Dublin,
Ireland
|
Tresco Abbey
Gardens, Tresco, Isles of Scilly, England
|
Ulster Museum
Botanic Garden, Belfast Northern Ireland.
|
John Matthews,
33 Sutton Road, New Plymouth
|
Chris and Brian
Rance, Invercargill
|
John Donald
Glendonald, RD 16 Fairlie
|
Steve Newall,
Dunedin
|
Dr Josephine
Ward, Canterbury University
|
Reproduced from: New Zealand Plants and their Story
Proceedings of a conference held in Wellington, 1-3 October 1999
ISBN 0-9597756-3-3
Web-notes:
1.
Reprinted
in the New Zealand Garden Journal, Volume three, number two December
2000, pp. 1521.
Top
of page
|